| How to Increase the ROI for Your
Customer Satisfaction Measurement Efforts (article 2 of 4)
by Service 800, Inc.
Article 2 – How Can I Analyze Customer Satisfaction and Benchmarking
Data Like The Pros?
Imagine that you are a college professor. At the end the year, the students
in each of your ten classes evaluate your teaching style. Year after year,
you’re pleased that you rank well above average for verbal skills, but
you continue to place low on the scale for preparation and presentation of
materials.
You participate in various skills enhancement programs offered by the university
and apply the techniques learned, but the results do not show improvement.
In frustration, you seek the help of a friend who is a statistics professor.
After carefully studying the data, your associate discovers several problems
with how you are analyzing the data.
Learn to properly analyze the satisfaction feedback by asking questions about
data collection.
Are Response Rates Consistent?
First, your colleague explains that the sample collected was dramatically different
for each class. For example, each class has 250 students. In five of the
classes, only 10-15 students volunteer to complete the questionnaire in each
class. You pass out questionnaires to everyone in the next three classes,
but do not require that they fill it out, so the response rates vary. In
the last two classes, all students are required to complete the questionnaire.
Question – Are the response rates consistent and proportionate from
each group for which you collect data? If response rates are not consistent
from each class, results may become more like ‘general feedback’ rather
than actionable data.
Does the Sample Size Yield a 95% (+/- 5%) Confidence Level?
Given the total number of students for the time period you are measuring, it
is best to use a sample size that yields a 95% (+/- 5%) confidence level.
In other words, a certain number (or sample) of people must respond in order
to understand how the total student population ranks your teaching style.
And remember, this does not mean that 95% of your students need to complete
the questionnaire, just the proper number (or sample) of individuals to reflect
the views of the majority of your students.
Question – Will the sample size yield a 95% (+/- 5%) confidence level?
If it does not, you may not be able to make confident decisions on ways to
make improvements to your teaching style.
Can you clearly identify high and low satisfaction scores?
Once you are certain the data collected is valid, you can make confident decision
based on the high and low scores. While it is not recommended that major changes
are implemented on the findings of only a few months of data, studying the
high and low scores is a good place to start and can lead to immediate change
in some cases. For example, you may discover that students rated you low in
accessibility outside of the classroom in the third month of data collection,
while the first two months of data were more favorable. After a few phone calls
to colleagues and students you find out that the new phone menu for the department
is confusing and too long.
Question…Am I investigating unusual high and low scores? React to unusually
high or low scores by investigating the cause of the problem before making
any major changes. If the cause is not apparent, trend the data over time to
determine if the score was a one-time occurrence, and review specific comments
made to help determine the cause of the low scores.
Are You Trending Data to Over Time to Pinpoint Problems?
When you study the data by morning, mid-day, and night classes by semester,
you see that your preparation and presentation skills are only weak in the
night classes, during the final semester of the each year. Until this point,
findings from night classes appeared slightly lower than other classes, but
did not seem significant. By comparing the results for several months, or
even an entire year, trends become more apparent and help you pinpoint areas
that need improvement.
Question…Am I studying the data over time to determine trends? Looking
only at one or two month’s data may not provide you with a full assessment
of your teaching strengths and weaknesses.
Do You Pay Attention to Large Swings in Results?
Small data swings may only be a sampling error and may not be significant.
You should not rush to employ changes based on small swings. On the contrary,
you should question large swings in your results or trends that create large
swings in data over time. The first step should be to find out if the change
is inside or outside the range of the 95% (+/- 5%) confidence level. Remember
you are working from a sample, not the entire population, and it is important
to understand what is and what is not an acceptable variance. By taking action
on every little down swing or upswing, you may find yourself working in circles.
Question – What is causing large swings in my satisfaction results?
Could it be an inappropriate sample size, response rate, or confidence level?
The best way to get the most out of your customer satisfaction data is to
ask questions, questions, and more questions before making assumptions or changes.
Next Week - Why is it Important to Study Satisfaction
Data for Different Customer Segments?
To Contact Us — To discuss this
topic, any other Benchmark Benefits article, or to provide topic
suggestions, please contact Jan DeMatteo at jan@service800.com.
For More Information — For additional
information about the SSPA SoftwareMetric Customer Satisfaction
Benchmark, SERVICE 800, or other benchmark programs, visit www.service800.com/benchmarkprograms.asp.
About SERVICE 800
Founded in 1989, SERVICE 800 designs and administrators
real-time customer satisfaction measurement programs, helping service
organizations follow up with their customers within hours or days
of service events. The company utilizes a distinctive follow up
telephone interview process along with e-mail, web, and other survey
techniques to measure customer satisfaction. With offices in Minneapolis
and London, SERVICE 800 has been measuring customer satisfaction
for corporations throughout the world for over a decade.
|